deu - [IC] Mēdyōmāh is *acquitted, not for this reason that Abarag is more *releasing on the manner of one-time-ablution and (that) the procedure has to be performed according to Abarag’s teaching, but the manner of one-time-ablution has to be accepted and organised by Abarag, the *plaintiff(?) of one purifier, from Mēdyōmāh (bearing) more witness.
deu - [Kanga64] (The teaching) of Mētyōkmāh is explainable not for this reason that the one-time ablution of Aparaγ is most explainable and one ought to act upon the teaching of Aparaγ, but (the teaching as regards) the one-time ablution from Aparaγ who is prior and (the teaching of) one purifying priest from Mētyōkmāh who (has) many witnesses should be accepted and put into practice.